Today, Governor Tim Pawlenty unveiled a proposed
constitutional amendment that would freeze Minnesota’s general fund
budget, limiting it to revenues collected in the previous biennium. The
proposed constitutional amendment would need to pass the Legislature
and then win approval from a majority of voters to become part of the
state constitution. Just this week, similar measures failed at the
ballot box in Maine and Washington.
“Once again, Governor Pawlenty is showing that he is
more focused on his presidential run in 2012, than he is on doing what
it is right for Minnesota, now, in 2009,” said MAPE Executive Director
Jim Monroe. “This proposal is shortsighted. It doesn’t consider the ups
and down of the economy as well as the needs of Minnesotans.”
The governor’s proposal would throw out the current
system of basing state spending commitments on estimated revenues in
favor of freezing the budget with revenue received during the previous
budget period. After passing a similar proposal, business leaders in
Colorado joined with citizens to repeal taxing restrictions.
“This amendment is a formula for disaster in
Minnesota, as it has been everywhere else it’s been tried,” said
Speaker of the House Margaret Anderson Kelliher. “It will cripple our
schools and hospitals, not to mention the businesses that rely on a
vital economy to survive.”
In the coming years, Minnesota will continue to
undergo massive demographic changes, including the continued
diversification of our workforce, mass retirements by baby boomers,
out-migration of college graduates and a sharp drop in high school
graduates. These challenges necessitate active leadership.
“This is nothing more than putting the State of
Minnesota on autopilot and a continued downward slide,” said Monroe.
“The people of Minnesota expect more than this out of our leadership.
We elect a governor and a Legislature, and then we should expect them
to make the necessary difficult choices to serve the needs of all
Minnesotans.”
-30-
Recent Comments